Informatics and Clinical Decision Support


Clinical Decision SupportThe volume of information involved in healthcare is growing at lightning speed, and this tremendous growth has created a serious gap between knowledge and clinical practice that experts say could be narrowed with the use of information technology (IT). According to the American Medical Informatics Association, "informatics has to do with all aspects of understanding and promoting the effective organization, analysis, management, and use of information in healthcare." IT facilitates the transfer of data about appropriate drugs, specific diseases, and patient characteristics so that it can be easily accessed and used at the point of care.

Not only can informatics streamline processes in healthcare, but it also has the potential to improve patient outcomes. According to the Institute of Medicine (IOM), about 1 medication error occurs per hospital patient per day. Roughly 530,000 preventable adverse drug events occur in outpatient Medicare patients each year, and 800,000 such events take place yearly in the long-term care setting. Of all the steps in the medication use process, the areas most frequently associated with errors are prescribing and administration

Healthcare organizations should eliminate most handwritten clinical data, including medication orders, monitoring, and prescriptions. Technologies that can facilitate this transition include:

Pharmacists are ideally suited to help implement informatics initiatives within healthcare systems because of their unique expertise in medication use. In fact, experts say that pharmacist involvement is critical. In recognition of this, the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy has mandated inclusion of informatics competencies at schools of pharmacy, and schools are moving quickly to comply.

Clinical Decision Support

Clinical Decision SupportMany new technologies represent changes to the physical medication administration process. In contrast, CDS tools represent a change in the decision-making aspect of the medication process; as a result, opinions about these tools' value can be quite varied. CDS was a major focus of the informatics sessions, not just because of presenters' differing viewpoints, but also because it can be integrated into many other technologies. For instance, CDS is often built into CPOE and EMR systems, giving it a broad scope of interest. However, it is judged by some as a substitute for clinical pharmacy services.

CDS is defined as "providing clinicians or patients with clinical knowledge and patient-related information, intelligently filtered or presented at appropriate times, to enhance patient care." CDS programs can automate daily functions and streamline services within healthcare organizations. In its simplest form, CDS can be a collection of electronic rules and alerts; however, to provide the biggest impact, it should have more advanced operations.

• Drug-allergy checking
• Basic dosing guidance in CPOE
• Formulary decision support
• Checking for duplicate therapy
• Drug-drug interaction checking
• Documentation templates (history and physical, clinic visit progress note)
• Relevant data presentation (flowsheets)
• Order creation facilitators (order sets)
• Protocol Support (clinical pathways)
• Reference information (info buttons)
• Unsolicited alerts (proactive warnings)
• Advanced dosing guidance (incorporating patient information)
• Advanced checking of drug-disease interactions and contraindications


Dr. Osheroff quizzed audience members at his session about their own experiences with CDS. When asked, "Are medication alerts reviewed on a regular basis at your institution?" 41% said yes, but did not know how frequently this occurred. Another 36% said they did not know if alerts were reviewed, and only 22% said that alerts were reviewed "often" at their health system.

When asked to name the top challenges they face in using CDS systems, the most common response was "alert fatigue" (44%). Other responses included insufficient resources for the CDS team (14%), getting the correct processes in place (20%), and implementing the basics (19%).

Alert fatigue is a phenomenon that occurs when numerous alerts bombard the user and lead them to override the warnings. Obviously, ignored alerts can limit the value of a CDS system and can negatively influence patient care. This problem may be partly related to "out-of-the-box" system configurations that are not customized to a specific work environment. Vendors are aware of this issue and are trying to address it. Without accepted standards and benchmarks, however, it is difficult to determine a threshold for alerts while balancing legal liability.

"CDS is good for clinical pharmacy because it is good for patients," Dr. Levin concluded. She gave 3 examples to illustrate her point:

While some degree of standardization is beneficial to prevent mistakes, Mr. Smith continued, CDS could also contribute to "cookie cutter medicine." Individual variations must still be considered when making drug therapy decisions. "CDS is not capable of taking all parameters into account right now," he said, because it is not sophisticated enough. He referred to this quote: "Conventional treatments are good for groups and wrong for individuals."

Finally, CDS could lead to a "cessation of analytical thought," Mr. Smith said. Due to the black-and-white nature of creating rules for CDS programs, people might forget that the practice of clinical pharmacy is often gray. This gray area requires a level of discernment provided by clinical pharmacists that is not reproducible by the technology that exists today. The problem with using CDS to help physicians make better clinical decisions is that, if the programmed rules miss the grey areas, patient care could be compromised.

Arguing against the use of CDS is not "politically correct," Mr. Smith said, but he believes the tools that exist today "are not cooked yet" and are unable to ensure equivalent outcomes to care provided with input from clinical pharmacists. Until these programs mature, clinical pharmacists should be wary of implementing them without reinforcing their own value to administrators. Pharmacists need to develop these arguments "before our positions are cut that we will need later," he said.

Get more information here

Last Updated ( Saturday, 26 July 2008 18:09 )